Introduction
In today’s cybersecurity landscape, organizations must adhere to rigorous security frameworks to protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with federal regulations. One of the most important frameworks is the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800 series, which provides extensive guidance on information security.
Among these guidelines, NIST 800-53 and NIST 800-115 play a crucial role in shaping how penetration testing is conducted. These documents outline best practices for security assessments, define compliance requirements, and help organizations strengthen their cybersecurity posture.
For organizations seeking to improve security through penetration testing, it is critical to understand how NIST 800 applies to these assessments. This article explores the relationship between NIST 800 and penetration testing, explains key controls that impact security testing, and highlights real-world industry case studies that demonstrate best practices in action.
Learn more about penetration testing services provided by Redbot Security.
Penetration testing is a fundamental security practice that simulates cyberattacks to identify weaknesses in an organization’s defenses. NIST provides structured guidance on how to conduct these tests to ensure they are effective and aligned with compliance requirements.
Two key documents in the NIST 800 series define penetration testing methodologies. NIST 800-53 outlines security controls that organizations must implement, including penetration testing as part of a broader security assessment strategy. NIST 800-115 provides a step-by-step guide on conducting security testing and penetration testing.
A large financial institution providing services to government agencies needed to comply with FISMA and FedRAMP security controls. Redbot Security conducted a comprehensive penetration test aligned with NIST 800-53 CA-8 to evaluate the organization’s infrastructure. The assessment identified critical authentication flaws that could have allowed attackers to escalate privileges. By remediating these vulnerabilities and implementing stronger multi-factor authentication, the institution successfully achieved compliance while improving overall security.
NIST 800-53 provides a framework of security controls that organizations must implement to protect information systems. Penetration testing falls under the category of security assessment and testing (CA-8) and is closely related to multiple other controls.
CA-8: Penetration Testing Control
The CA-8 control requires organizations to conduct penetration testing at regular intervals and after significant system changes. This ensures that vulnerabilities are identified before they can be exploited by attackers.
Organizations must conduct penetration testing periodically to ensure security controls remain effective. Testing should be performed by an independent party to maintain objectivity. This can be an external security firm like Redbot Security or an internal red team that operates separately from IT and security teams. The test must simulate tactics that real-world attackers use to compromise systems. Assessments should focus on critical assets and high-risk areas. Any vulnerabilities discovered during testing must be fixed, and follow-up tests should confirm that security improvements are effective.
Other NIST 800-53 controls that relate to penetration testing include RA-5: Vulnerability Scanning, which requires organizations to conduct regular vulnerability scans. SI-2: Flaw Remediation mandates that identified vulnerabilities must be addressed. PM-14: Testing, Training, and Monitoring requires ongoing security assessments and workforce training.
A large healthcare provider handling sensitive patient data required penetration testing to comply with HIPAA and NIST 800-53 guidelines. Redbot Security conducted external and internal network penetration tests, uncovering a misconfigured firewall rule that exposed sensitive patient data to unauthorized access. The remediation efforts involved tightening access controls, patching vulnerabilities, and implementing stronger encryption protocols. As a result, the organization avoided potential data breaches and remained compliant with federal security regulations.
While NIST 800-53 defines security controls at a high level, NIST 800-115 provides technical guidance on conducting penetration testing. It establishes a structured methodology to ensure tests are comprehensive and effective.
NIST 800-115 breaks penetration testing into four key phases. The planning phase establishes the scope, objectives, and rules of engagement for penetration testing. This includes defining which systems and applications will be tested, establishing legal and compliance requirements, and obtaining formal authorization for testing.
The discovery phase involves gathering intelligence about the target environment, including passive reconnaissance that collects publicly available information without direct system interaction. Active scanning uses tools like Nmap and Nessus to identify network hosts and open ports. Vulnerability analysis maps discovered services against known vulnerabilities.
The attack phase attempts to exploit identified vulnerabilities using network attacks that exploit misconfigurations and weak authentication, web application attacks that test for SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and authentication bypass, privilege escalation to gain unauthorized administrative access, and lateral movement to expand access across the organization’s network.
The reporting phase documents findings in a penetration test report, including an executive summary with high-level findings for business leaders, technical details documenting exploited vulnerabilities, risk assessment prioritizing vulnerabilities based on potential impact, and mitigation strategies providing specific recommendations for addressing security weaknesses.
A government defense contractor needed penetration testing to meet CMMC and NIST 800-171 compliance requirements. Redbot Security performed an internal network penetration test, identifying several outdated systems vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. By upgrading their infrastructure and implementing stricter access controls, the contractor significantly reduced its attack surface and achieved compliance with federal security mandates.
Organizations should establish a formal penetration testing policy that defines testing frequency based on compliance needs. They should ensure that scope and objectives align with NIST 800-53 and 800-115. Hiring certified penetration testers ensures high-quality assessments that comply with CA-8 requirements.
Organizations should combine annual penetration tests with continuous monitoring, including automated vulnerability scans using tools like Qualys, red teaming exercises simulating persistent threats, and bug bounty programs to engage ethical hackers. All discovered vulnerabilities should be remediated, and follow-up testing should confirm fixes are effective.
Organizations must keep detailed penetration test reports for compliance audits, ensuring alignment with FISMA, FedRAMP, and CMMC. Learn more about how Redbot Security helps businesses stay compliant.
NIST 800 provides a structured framework for penetration testing that organizations must follow to maintain compliance and strengthen their security posture. By implementing guidelines from NIST 800-53 and NIST 800-115, organizations can ensure their security assessments are thorough, repeatable, and aligned with federal standards.
Redbot Security specializes in NIST-compliant penetration testing, helping organizations identify vulnerabilities, enhance security defenses, and meet regulatory requirements. Contact us today to schedule a penetration test aligned with NIST 800 standards.
NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5: Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations
This publication offers a comprehensive catalog of security and privacy controls designed to protect organizational operations, assets, individuals, and the nation from various threats and risks. It serves as a foundational framework for implementing security measures within federal information systems.
Access the publication here.
NIST Special Publication 800-115: Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment
This guide provides practical recommendations for designing, implementing, and maintaining technical information security testing and assessment processes. It is instrumental in planning and conducting security assessments, analyzing findings, and developing mitigation strategies.
Access the publication here.
NIST Special Publication 800-53 (Wikipedia)
An overview of NIST SP 800-53, detailing its purpose, revisions, and impact on information security practices. This resource offers a concise summary and historical context of the publication.
Read more on Wikipedia.
NIST SP 800-115 and Penetration Testing | USA – Software Secured
An article discussing the NIST SP 800-115 framework and its implications for penetration testing methodologies. It provides insights into how organizations can align their penetration testing practices with NIST guidelines.
Read the article here.
NIST SP 800-53 Compliance | Improve Your Security System
An exploration of NIST SP 800-53’s role as a gold standard in information security, detailing how organizations can leverage its controls to enhance their security posture and achieve compliance.
Learn more here.
How NIST SP 800-115 Informs Information Security Practices
An article highlighting the value of NIST SP 800-115 in shaping penetration testing methodologies and its influence on identifying organizational vulnerabilities.
Read the article here.
NIST SP 800-115 Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment (YouTube Video)
A video presentation providing an overview of NIST SP 800-115, covering its key components and guidance on information security testing and assessment.
Watch the video here.
These resources offer detailed information on NIST publications and their impact on penetration testing requirements, providing valuable insights for organizations aiming to enhance their cybersecurity practices.
Book a discovery call or request a rapid quote for services, tailored to your priorities and budget.
From manual testing of IT Networks and Web / Mobile Applications to advanced Red Team operations, Cloud Security, and OT-network assessments, Redbot Security delivers laser-focused, senior-level expertise, without breaking the bank.
SOC 2 compliance is now essential for building trust with clients. This step-by-step guide explains the process and how consulting services accelerate success.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) goes beyond tools. Discover how Redbot Security combines automated scanning with expert penetration testing for proven results.
Zero Trust requires strict verification of people as well as technology. Allowing foreign or crowdsourced hackers into your environment opens the door to sanctions violations, insider threats, and export-control breaches. Learn why U.S. companies should restrict penetration testing to vetted U.S.-based experts.
U.S. critical infrastructure is facing unprecedented cyber risk. This article explores ICS/SCADA security, the Purdue Model, and safe OT penetration testing practices. Discover why layered testing is essential and how Redbot Security helps organizations strengthen defenses against ransomware, remote access threats, and operational disruption.
Prompt injection attacks are a rising AI security risk in 2025. Learn how attackers manipulate LLMs to exfiltrate data, bypass safeguards, and cause real damage, and how Redbot Security uses penetration testing, OWASP frameworks, and risk assessments to defend against this evolving threat..
Redbot Security explains how RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) Testing protects AI systems from prompt injection, data poisoning, and hallucinations
APIs power today’s digital economy but are prime targets for attackers. Redbot Security delivers advanced API penetration testing and compliance-ready reports for PCI DSS, HIPAA, and ISO 27001.
Political shutdowns are dismantling U.S. cyber defenses at the very moment attackers are escalating. Redbot Security warns why proactive penetration testing is critical in 2025.
Red team testing, also called a red team test, simulates real-world cyberattacks to measure detection and response. Discover the process, benefits, common scenarios, and how to choose the right red team testing provider for your organization’s cybersecurity resilience.
APIs power today’s digital economy but are prime targets for attackers. Redbot Security delivers advanced API penetration testing and compliance-ready reports for PCI DSS, HIPAA, and ISO 27001.
Ransomware-as-a-Service is exploding in 2025, giving even low-level hackers nation-state-level power. Discover how Redbot Security’s penetration testing and red team engagements help organizations stay ahead of this growing cyber threat.
Redbot Social