
The CrowdStrike Incident: Proof Critical Infrastructure is not Prepared for Real Cyber Threats
Our nation is under attack and overwhelmed. Modern Security teams face numerous challenges in managing network and application security effectively.
Manual Penetration Testing compared to Automated Vulnerability Scans and why you should implement both.
Penetration tests use different methods to detect application vulnerabilities and evaluate the system or network. During such processes, systems’ weak designs will be exploited via the authorization of simulation attacks. The test aims to protect sensitive information against outsiders like hackers that may unauthorizedly access your system. Once the vulnerability has been detected, the exploitable data can then be retrieved from the system in the hope of obtaining the data. A penetration test is also called a pen test.
Adversaries continue to show that they have moved beyond malware. CrowdStrike has observed that attackers increasingly attempt to accomplish their objectives without writing malware to the endpoint. Rather, they have been observed using legitimate credentials and built-in tools — a “living off the land” (LOTL) approach — in a deliberate effort to evade detection by legacy antivirus products. Of all detections indexed by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud in the fourth quarter of 2021, 62% were malware-free.” CrowdStrike
So, how do organizations protect their critical data and systems in today’s evolving threat landscape? Is manual penetration testing with the human element more reliable than automated vulnerability scanners? What is Manual Penetration Testing, and How Does it Work?
Definition: Manual Penetration Testing is a controlled assessment of networks and applications that can safely identify and validate real-world vulnerabilities that are potentially exploitable. Manual Penetration Testing removes false positives and provides proof of concept reporting and an exploit storyboard for more accessible remediation.
Manual penetration testing is quickly becoming the top choice over automated tests for organizations looking to simulate what a threat actor could do. With a deep dive into networks, devices, and applications, Manual Penetration Testing, if performed correctly, can identify exploitable vulnerabilities that are either easily missed out by automated tests or something a scanner cannot do.
MCPT or manual controlled penetration testing is performed by an ethical hacker or penetration tester with the same knowledge as a malicious actor. Fortunately, an ethical hacker is on the good side and will be able to simulate what the wrong side can do. The penetration tester highlights many business logic flaws that automated software typically fails to identify. However, remember that Manual Penetration Testing can be time-consuming and more expensive than running a scan.
Typically, a Manual Penetration Test or Pen-test is performed by Senior Level Experts who find vulnerabilities in a system, network, and application. Utilizing their experience with network systems, custom scripts, and tools, the Sr. Level Engineer manually takes the appropriate controlled steps to exploit those vulnerabilities. Additional knowledge and expertise within IT/OT environments are essential for performing a non-disruptive manual penetration test. Hiring inexperienced teams can often result in unintentional denial of service or, worse, denial of service or, worse case, cause sensitive services to crash.
Discovery. The first phase of penetration testing is OSINT and Discovery.
Penetration Testing. Qualified engineers perform the testing phase – The Penetration tester utilizes automated scanners for enumeration and port scanning and then performs manual exploitation based on their expertise, testing techniques, and tools knowledge.
Assessment. The team then Determines Risks to the organization based on the appropriate frameworks used during the penetration testing phase.
Knowledge Sharing. The Penetration Tester or Pen-Test Team Provides precise results with Proof of Concept reporting and Remediation recommendations.
Remediation. The Organization remediates findings that pose a risk.
Retesting. The Penetration Tester will Retest the remediated vulnerabilities and provide a final pen-test report with proof of remediation.
It’s important to know that current technology has made significant progress but is currently unable to compete with modern-day hackers, ” the human element.”
"It’s easy to break things. Much, much easier, it seems, than building them."
Steven Weber Tweet
Modern-day scanners and Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) providers typically cannot ‘hack’ their way into privileged information. A vulnerability scan is not a worthy substitute for a highly focused testing engagement driven by human knowledge and expertise.
Manual Penetration Testing or MCPT Manual Controlled Penetration Testing is thorough and, in many projects, will look for issues such as:
A Penetration Test can help your team find exploitable vulnerabilities before bad actors find them.
If you are looking to find exploitable vulnerabilities on your OT/IT networks, Manual Controlled Penetration Testing (MCPT®) is an easy-to-execute cost-effective solution.
Manual Controlled Penetration Testing provides reports written by experts highlighting critical data, how targets were compromised, recommendations on best practices, and a complete review of remediation recommendations.
The difference, not always noticeable, concerns the testing goals and the organization’s current security approach.
A vulnerability assessment is designed to identify as many vulnerabilities as possible within a network, application, or system. This assessment usually occurs as a first-level analysis within an organization to help determine its current security posture. The organization will know they have problems and need help identifying them.
Penetration tests are typically reserved for organizations that have obtained their desired security posture. That has eliminated all known and discovered vulnerabilities. Have updated systems, patches, and some cyber security programs in place. The penetration test will simulate a scenario of attempting to breach an organization’s strategy by finding exploits and vulnerabilities based on pre-organized goals.
Should I perform a vulnerability assessment and a penetration test?
The classic rule of thumb for an organization is that you should do a vulnerability assessment anytime significant changes occur to your network.
Here are a few examples of these changes.
As we can see, scheduling vulnerability assessments can be complicated to budget and plan without a long-term IT implementation plan. Some companies offer organizations the option of pre-purchasing vulnerability assessments on an annual contract. If a company typically performs (4) checks a year, although, at various times, this becomes a valuable, cost-effective option.
Testing becomes more periodic when we start talking about manual penetration testing. Every organization is dynamic. Everything is in a continual state of change, from the data to the infrastructure. There are multiple factors to analyze to determine when and how a penetration test should occur. These factors can range from your current IT footprint, company size, compliance, and regulation levels to regions where you do business or organizational growth. Either way, best practice dictates that all companies with some level of cyber posture perform at least one penetration test yearly.
Manual Penetration Testing Advantages and Disadvantages
In summary, a vulnerability scanner such as Nessus* or Nmap* is necessary to discover vulnerabilities by internal scans performed by your company or by 3rd parties. Manual Penetration Testing goes quite a bit farther, verifying false positives and manually attempting to show proof of concept for exploits. Something a scanner is not able to do at the present moment.
*Nessus is one of the most popular vulnerability scanners, with over two million downloads across the globe. Additionally, Nessus provides comprehensive coverage, scanning for over 59,000 CVEs.
*Nmap Port Scanner. This tool does not go as broad in its detection but focuses more on mapping open ports (services) across a network. An available port that should not be accessible can still be a vulnerability.
There are many other Penetration Testing Tools; view more info here.
Senior Level Hands-on-Keyboard
Manual Testing
Get a Project QuoteOur nation is under attack and overwhelmed. Modern Security teams face numerous challenges in managing network and application security effectively.
Cymbiotic Hive: The Simple, Rapid-Deployment Solution to Access Management
Redbot Security’s senior-level cloud security team brings years of expertise in AWS, GCP, and Azure security. Our approach is rooted in manual-controlled testing and deep-dive security analysis, ensuring that we uncover hidden vulnerabilities that automated tools often miss.
Internal network penetration testing is essential for identifying security gaps within an organization’s infrastructure. Attackers exploit misconfigured permissions, weak credentials, and unpatched vulnerabilities to escalate privileges and move laterally within networks. A thorough penetration test helps uncover these risks before they are exploited, ensuring stronger security controls, improved access management, and compliance with industry standards. Redbot Security’s expert-led penetration testing provides in-depth assessments to fortify your internal network against evolving threats.
Understanding NIST 800 and Its Impact on Penetration Testing Requirements.
From pipelines and water systems to power grids and transit networks, U.S. critical infrastructure is under siege. With CISA budget slashed, is a national cyber disaster inevitable?
Cybercriminals are ditching malware and exploiting trusted tools already inside your systems. Learn how Living off the Land (LotL) attacks work, and how to stop them.
From API-server exploits to supply-chain threats, this checklist shows how the best penetration testing companies harden Kubernetes. Boost resilience now.
The FBI released its FY 2024 IC3 Annual Report on April 24, 2025, detailing 859,532 complaints and a record $16.6 billion in losses. In this post, we highlight how phishing, BEC, and cryptocurrency fraud continue to surge, why ransomware remains a top threat to critical infrastructure, and which demographics are most at risk. Plus, discover Redbot Security’s proven strategies,from manual penetration testing to red teaming, that can help you turn IC3 data into actionable defenses.
Malicious actors prey on weak configurations like locusts. Microsoft, despite knowing that their operating systems, have inherent weaknesses have done little to enhance their initial security outside of remediation for publicly known vulnerabilities.
The following article is a discussion about helping you to best utilize your military skills to successfully transition into the commercial space.
The following article is a discussion that explores JavaScript Web Tokens
The following article is a discussion that explores Wave Behaviors to Locate Wireless Access Points and Devices
Today, cybercriminals have plenty of entry points to exploit. Therefore, it has become crucial for organizations to improve their attack surface visibility to have more effective protection. This is where attack surface management (ASM) comes into play. This article will explore all about attack surface management (ASM), including its importance, working principle, and benefits.
Should an Employee Report Security Incidents Involving Family Members? Is your business or job at risk if a bad actor gets access to your family. Will they gain access to you?
The likelihood of a cyber attack on a mobile platform is significantly high, but how difficult is it for a malicious actor to generate malware? You might be surprised.
Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities pose a significant risk to the security of web applications, allowing attackers unauthorized access to sensitive data and functionalities. By understanding the implications of IDOR and adopting secure coding practices, web developers can protect their applications and users from potential exploitation.
Mass Assignment Vulnerability occurs when a web application allows users to submit a more extensive set of data than is intended or safe. The potential consequences of this vulnerability can be severe
Attackers can manipulate the serialized data to execute malicious code, compromise the application, or gain unauthorized access.
Kerberos Authentication Service Response (AS-REP) Roasting, a technique similar to Kerberoasting, has gained prominence as a method for attackers to compromise Active Directory (AD) authentication systems.
Becoming proficient in Operational Technology (OT), Industrial Control Systems (ICS), and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) network testing can appear daunting as there are fewer learning resources.
Machine Learning (ML) is a subset of AI, and, more than likely, closely aligns with what we consider to be AI in the media.
Recent reports of significant cybersecurity layoffs in the United States have raised concerns about the nation’s preparedness to defend against cyber threats
While plenty of articles cover the Modbus protocol with varying degrees of detail and usage, this article aims to examine the Modbus protocol with an offensive security lens.
What is an API? APIs, including local and remote, come in various forms and are fundamental to modern software development. They serve as the bridge between different software components, enabling them to work together seamlessly.
Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) presents various security risks for organizations. This article will help you understand a Relay Attack.
Client-side desyncs are a class of browser-powered HTTP smuggling attacks. What you need to know and how to prevent a malicious actor from taking advantage of this vulnerability.
Malicious actors leveraging OSINT to uncover confidential and sensitive information that is publicly available online. Learn how to prevent risks.
While penetration testing is valuable in identifying technical vulnerabilities, red teaming provides a more holistic assessment by simulating realistic threat scenarios. By embracing red teaming, organizations can bolster their defenses, uncover weaknesses, and stay one step ahead of sophisticated adversaries.
Through repeated random sampling, allows us to simulate a wide array of social engineering attacks with a depth and breadth previously unimaginable.
Is your security team sharing sensitive data unknowingly?
Our nation is under attack and overwhelmed. Modern Security teams face numerous challenges in managing network and application security effectively.
Increasingly, investors see proactive cybersecurity spending as a hallmark of strong corporate governance. It can be factored into how they value a company’s resilience and risk profile
With data breaches surging by 68% last year alone, cybersecurity has evolved from a low-key technical matter into a defining issue demanding top-level attention.
Check out the latest cybersecurity news around the globe
Let’s be honest folks, vulnerability management isn’t the same game it was five years ago. But […]
Reporting to the CFO instead of the CIO can help CISOs frame cybersecurity in business terms, […]
Das britische Traditionsunternehmen Marks & Spencer wurde offenbar von Cyberkriminellen […]
G Data warnt davor, die Komplexität heutiger Bedrohungsszenarien zu unterschätzen.Pictrider – […]
Attackers have been exploiting a critical zero-day vulnerability in the Visual Composer component […]
Our expert team will help scope your project and provide a fast and accurate project estimate.
Contact Redbot Security